Weight: 14.5oz
Filter Size: 67mm
On paper this oddity is near perfect for expedition
kayaking with a full frame Nikon camera. The lens is an oddity because
it was only produced for four years, and production was overlapped by a
lens that is more expensive and in general, less well regarded
optically; the Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4D. It's one small package, barely
larger than the 18-55mm kit lens, but packed with ED glass and (at the
time) new AF-S technology all for under $400. Yet if you're a
follower of this site, you rarely if ever see this lens used. The lens
is well designed, sharp, and has accurate focusing. Yet there is
something
about the way this lens renders images that I dislike and it's almost
inarticulate. If color is pushed at all, the image just "looks digital"
and isn't to my taste. Perhaps the ED glass gives extra contrast and
saturation best suited to film.
This image of Will Pruett is straight
from in camera RAW, no saturation or vibrance added, yet looks almost
like Fuji Velvia.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 IF-ED AF-S @ 24mm 1/1250 f8 ISO 400
Taylor Cavin goes first. In full shade/low contrast light like this I
would not normally except to be losing detail in the shadows, but I am.
Nikon
D700, Nikkor
24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 IF-ED AF-S
@ 24mm 1/800 f5 ISO 1600
A 100% crop of the edge of the image, not too bad at all.
Nikon
D700, Nikkor
24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 IF-ED AF-S
@ 24mm 1/800 f5 ISO 1600
Petite
set next to the 70-300mm VR.
Build: 6/10
- Lots of
plastic with a metal lens mount, a step above Nikon kit quality, but
not near pro-grade.
Handling: 810
- This light lens handles
very well and has instant AF override.
Performance: 7/10
- Really good performance for the size,
weight and cost.
Value: 8/10
- Did
someone say bang for the buck?
Overall: 6/10
- Personal dislike for the
look of images from this lens drop the score here.
Practicality
for kayaking: 9/10 If you like the look this lens
delivers, it may very well be the best mid-range zoom for shooting
expedition style kayaking on a full frame Nikon camera. It's sharp,
light, small and focuses quickly. It's probably a bit fragile but
(somewhat) expendable with its $300 market value. As long as supplies
last that is, because it did have a short production lifespan. At one
point the 67mm filter ring was out of place, but these days matches
well with the 70-300VR. In fact, looking at the two you can see how
closely they are related. On the other hand, if you don't like the look
this lens delivers, well I can't help you there. A common theme you'll
see in reviews is that this is a good lens, yet never one people love
and swear by (or at).
Other links:
Thom
Hogan's Review