Weight: 11oz
Filter Size: 49mm
Macro lenses are generally expensive, and there is quite a
bit of irony in that. Take the $970 Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 ED-IF AF-S VR
Micro-Nikkor for example. Most serious macro work is done on a tripod,
where VR is best turned off. The depth of field is so thin that
stopping down considerably is the norm, and AF is not accurate enough.
IF stands for internal focusing, which is great if you have a polarizer
on the front. Once again not a likely situation for macro photography.
So on a $970 lens we're turning off most of its features and stopping
the lens down considerably. Now is the obvious question, why have all
those features if they are all turned off? Versatility. The well made
Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 macro is a sharp lens for all types of photography,
albeit a bit slow to focus.
On the other hand, the Phoenix 100mm f/3.5 Macro is not
versatile. The lightweight, all plastic and glass lens has little to
offer outside the realm of macro photography, but it is $870 cheaper
than the Nikkor. The build quality is dismal, but the focus throw is
nice and long. The lens only reaches 1:1 life size reproduction with
the included matched adapter.
Image quality is good but not
breath-taking. Better than you'd expect for only $100.
Nikon D5100, Phoenix 100mm f/3.5 Macro @ 1/25 f8 ISO 100
A 100% crop of the in focus area on the bottom.
Nikon D5100, Phoenix 100mm f/3.5 Macro @ 1/25 f8 ISO 100
What's interesting is that the lens works well with the old Nikon PK-13
extension ring, now capturing a larger than life sized image. This is
not your normal full sized flower.
Sony
NEX-5N, Phoenix
100mm f/3.5 Macro @ 1/8 f16 ISO 400
A
100% crop with no sharpening.
Sony
NEX-5N, Phoenix
100mm f/3.5 Macro @ 1/8 f16 ISO 400
The above may not look like much, until you realize how small this
insect is. Godzilla finger!
Build: 3/10
- Terrible
quality build, feels like a plastic toy.
Handling: 6/10
- Better than one would
expect considering the build. Aperture ring is snappy and focus is
smooth (but not Nikkor smooth of course)
Performance: 6/10
- No stunning sharpness, but not terribly
soft here either.
Value: 9/10
- A
dedicated Macro lens for little more than the cost of a tank of gas?
Overall: 7/10
- If you're looking to do some
macro photography as a hobby on a budget, look no further.
Practicality
for kayaking: 1/10 It's a macro lens. It would be a
dismal lens to use for shooting anything else. As is, combined with a
used PK-13 you can have some fun macro experiences for under $150 and
get decent optical results.
Other links:
Nikonian's
Review